The Federal Council has decided to take the initiative the Zurich liberalism support now anyway. This, after they rejected last fall still. What may have led to this flip-flop?
Association complaints should not be possible if a project by the people or parliaments is approved. The Federal Council supports the initiative of the People's Zurich liberalism.source
had last fall recommended that the State Government to reject the petition of the FDP. The recent U-turn pushes for green links to outrage.
The reason for the turnaround of the Federal Council stated in a release, the amendment of the Parliament did not include all legitimate concerns of the initiative. The second reason cited Leuenberger at a media conference organized at short notice: according to Private not always perform public functions.
More explanations on these two points did not Leuenberger. He spoke of an "interim decision of the Federal Council" and stressed that they had always used for the promotion of the association's right of application. The message now go to parliament, said he expected that this initiative to recommend rejection.
It is now affixed to the time, some facts about the collective appeal.
She is always only successful if the authorizing governments and parliaments to their own laws contrary - the Zurich FDP fights so for themselves
And it is a moderation employed means such as shown by its application in 2006:
For the third time 17 symptom legitimate outdoor sports associations and environmental organizations throughout Switzerland their objections and complaints brought together as advocates of nature. The evaluation shows that 63 percent of the cases already on the lowest level, ie at level community could be done. Only six cases reached 2006, the Federal Court. Thus the statistics for 2006 confirmed the cautious use of the right of the organizations.
showed activity in relation to the complaint In the last three years, in addition to the constant high Gutheissungsquote from 70 to 80 percent a little different picture: a year only 6 to 8 cases go before the Federal Court, 15 to 25 are before the Administrative Court and 60 percent of the cases already done at the community level . So that the numbers Research by the University of Geneva 1996 confirm the period to 2003. Also from this period could be derived responsible behavior and consistency in the handling of the right of application.
source
We have to do so again once more with the excesses of the only self-interest and to safeguard the interests of their clients thoughtful bourgeois politics. The facts speak a different language, namely: moderate use, extremely high success rate, because actually preceded Gestzesverstösse. The Civil
dare not undermine the environmental protection legislation in full, because it is rooted in the people well. So they take the associations the right to point the finger in their dealing with them - so they do not have their own rules to keep.
And this kind of "policy" system - you see it every day in dealing with the Clean Air Act: Currently, the ozone limit already exceeded this year for the next 90 years in advance, the bourgeois-dominated authorities they do not provide for action. In small
the plays from the forum: It draws attention to the legal basis - and reap only scorn and derision.
I can Schwanen the evil, about the future of our terms of environmental protection once good country.
