Stomach Upset After Vegetables

smoke signals IV - my answer

Very Mr X

Thanks for the reply. I'm not quite agree with your statement.

The study also says that you cited that, of the said 3.8 billion Swiss francs, which cause the smoking industry by illness, death or disability, these same smokers 2.8 billion. For this we subsidize the AHV of non smokers with 1.5 billion a year, the voluntary renunciation of five to ten years life expectancy, so AHV reference counting. In order for the CSS (author of the study) was ever on the high amount, they still had einrechnen 5 billion francs costs by reducing the quality of life, But we bear it himself. My quality of life is influenced by smoking, but only insofar as I am of the holy war against the tobacco soon chased everywhere.

And of course it is my right to harm myself. If it were not so, would contact the BAG so long ago against the sport (eg thousands of serious skiing accidents every week).
is not entirely clear to me why the BAG always with the excuse of the air pollution Bafu only has jurisdiction to wriggle out of attempts. The core role of BAG is the public health and control healthcare costs. And here is playing the air pollution a major role.
So why not fulfill his duty, the BAG and manifests itself in any way on the subject? be 40 000 new chronic patients a year, that should be at least one entry on the website value!
Again: What I do to my own health, that's my business. As long as sport is permitted in any form, people can eat what they want to drink as much as they want and the sick breathing in and of itself gives me no one has to interfere. So you can only argue with the deceased on passive smoking, and then the numbers look quite different. And as you say yourself, it lacks the basics.
I feel the unilateral curtailment of my freedom as a rough violation against my personal rights. If, then, is so large, for example, the need for smoke-free pickling, why do we have in our market economy is not much more smoke-free premises? Is not it much more likely that smokers are konsumationsfreudiger and deliver one way or the larger part of sales? Will you, before you connect with maximum exposure to the public, first clarify the real needs and the possible consequences? Are you aware that, according to ZDF had to close in New York already has 200 clubs, because the noise of neighbors gathered outside the door smoking and Non smoking endured? Do you know how many bars there are, run in which only smokers, and While in the Gastig like the staff? And remember: I can choose whether I go into a smoky bar. The air pollution but you can never escape.

And again: Where does the misconception that the Federal Office of Public Health have to do with the health effects of air pollution is not? Is it really as you say, because it's just easier to fight against smoking?

I am, as you note, not satisfied with your answer and wait so looking forward to your opinion.